Physicochemical and sensory analysis of two foodstuffs made from organic chicken meat (Gallus gallus domesticus)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31908/19098367.586Keywords:
healthy eating, chicken meat, sensory evaluation, meat industry, organic productsAbstract
The aim of this research was to develop two meat food products from organic chicken and evaluate some of their physicochemical, nutritional and sensory properties. Physicochemical characteristics, nutritional value and sensory evaluation of two traditional products were studied, such as chorizo sausages and burgers made from chicken meat produced organically. Sensory evaluation was performed from a panel of judges untrained evaluators, consisting of 100 adults of both sexes. Was used a format to determine the attributes taste, color, smell, texture and overall opinion, based on a seven-point hedonic scale. The panel of evaluators shower results in high favorability toward the parameters taste, smell, texture and general opinion, not to the color, which leads to the conclusion that processed products have very good acceptability and therefore organic chicken it is feasible for the development of traditional meat foodstuffs high acceptance.
Downloads
References
FAO, Composición de la carne. Carne y productos cárnicos. 2015. Disponible: http://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/themes/es/meat/backgr_ composition.html. Citado el 02 de abril de 2015.
IFOAM, The world of organic agriculture, Statics & Emerging Trends 2014, Rheinbreitbatch, Germany, 2014, p. 302.
A. M. Tulian, “Viabilidad de producción de carne orgánica en las Islas del pre-delta diamantino”. Numeral 98: Las tesinas de Belgrano. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Universidad de Belgrano, 2004.
J. M. Antle, “The new economics of agriculture,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 81, no. 5, pp. 993-1010, Dic. 1999.
M. D. Ranken, Manual de Industrias de la Carne, AMV Ediciones, Madrid, 2003.
MAMR, Valor y volumen de los productos ecológicos de origen nacional en la industria agroalimentaria española. 2010. Disponible: http://www.magrama.gob.es/es/alimentación/temas/la-agriculturaecologica//valoración_de_la_produccion_ecologica _española (2009)tcm7-132015.pdf Consultado el 02 de septiembre de 2014.
F. Ellendorff, “The crossroad of consumer demand and reality,” World Poultry, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 24-25, 2003.
AOAC Official methods of analysis, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 15a. ed. Arlington, USA. 1990. pp. 152-169.
A. D. Woyewoda, S. J. Shaw, P. J. Ke and B. G. Burns, Recommended Laboratory Methods for Assessment of Fish Quality, Numeral 1448: Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. Halifax, Canada, 1986, pp. 143.
C. S. Cheng, O. O. Hamann, N. B. Webb and V. Sidwell, “Effects of species and storage time on minced fish gel texture,” Journal of Food Science, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 1087-1092, 1979.
M. C. Meilgaard, B. T. Carr, and G. V. Civille, Sensory evaluation techniques, CRC Press, Boca Ratón, 2006.
F. Hart, H. Fisher, Análisis moderno de los alimentos. Edición en lengua española, Ed. Acribia, Zaragoza, España, 1984, pp. 5-29.
M. Vargas-Zárate, F. Becerra-Bulla, and E. Prieto-Suárez, “Evaluación de la ingesta dietética en estudiantes universitarios. Bogotá, Colombia,” Rev Salud Pública, vol. 12, no 1, pp. 116-125, 2010.
A. Kristallys, I. Arvanitoyannis, and G. Chryssohoidis, “Is there a real difference between conventional and organic meat? Investigating consumers’ attitudes towards both meat types as an indicator of organic meats’ market potential,” Journal of Food Products Marketing, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 47-78, 2006.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Entre ciencia e ingeniería
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
